Prosa-Skills entfernt und neue Planungs-Skills erstellet

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-24 20:09:45 +02:00
parent 8470a2f29e
commit b0b6e530d3
5 changed files with 137 additions and 326 deletions

86
execute-plan/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
---
name: execute-plan
description: |
Execute an implementation plan by splitting it into parallel tasks, delegating
to worker subagents, verifying with reviewers, and running tests. Use when
there is a plan (session decisions or file) that needs to be implemented.
user-invocable: true
---
# execute-plan
## Parameters
Pass an optional plan file path: `/skill:execute-plan PLAN.md`. Without a file, use the current session's accumulated decisions as the plan.
## Protocol
### 1. Read or collect the plan
- If a file path is given as argument, read it.
- Otherwise, use the current session's decisions/direction as the plan.
### 2. Delegate to `planner`
Fork a `planner` subagent with `outputSchema` to produce a structured task graph:
```json
{
"tasks": [
{
"id": "string",
"description": "string",
"instructions": "string",
"outputs": ["file/path.ts"],
"reads": [],
"dependsOn": ["task-id"],
"runTests": ["cmd"]
}
]
}
```
The planner must ensure parallelizable tasks have **disjoint `outputs`**.
### 3. Execute by dependency waves
Topologically sort the tasks. For each wave (tasks with no unmet dependencies):
- Launch all wave tasks in parallel with `fresh` context `worker` subagents.
- Wrap each worker's prompt with:
> You are the sole writer for the task below. Do not modify any files outside the listed `outputs`. If you encounter problems, report them clearly. On success, report what you changed and confirm completion.
- Wait for the wave to complete (`wait({ all: true })`).
### 4. Handle failures
- Collect all failures from the wave.
- Delegate to a `reviewer` subagent (`fresh` context) to investigate failures and produce a repair plan (a new task graph covering only unresolved problems).
- Recursively invoke `execute-plan` on the repair plan.
- **Cap:** maximum 5 repair iterations. After that, present remaining problems to the user and ask how to proceed.
- Prompt the user **only for conceptual/scope-level problems** that cannot be fixed without altering the plan's scope.
### 5. Verify results
When all waves complete successfully:
- Launch a parallel `reviewer` fanout (`fresh` context) with distinct angles:
1. Correctness / regressions
2. Guideline conformance
3. Tests / validation
- Each reviewer may run tests as needed but must report only overall findings, not test output.
- If reviewers find problems, generate a repair plan and go to step 4.
### 6. Run tests
Run any test commands from the original plan context (`runTests` fields or globally known test commands). Report the outcome. Failures generate a repair plan (step 4).
### 7. Present results
Summarize to the user: what was implemented, verification status, test results, and any remaining open items.
## Constraints
- Workers run with `fresh` context.
- One writer thread per worktree; do not launch parallel workers modifying the same files.
- Do not enact the plan without going through this protocol.